Under credibility rules, the court may admit the declarant's inconsistent statement or conduct regardless of when it occurred.

• A. Rule 805
• B. Rule 806
• C. Rule 901. (b)(3)
• D. Rule 804. (b)(4)

Answer: (B)

When a declarant’s credibility has been attacked, the court can rehabilitate that credibility by admitting evidence of the declarant’s inconsistent statements or conduct, and it may be admitted regardless of when those statements or conduct occurred. This rule lets the jury consider the overall pattern of honesty rather than a single misstatement, even if the prior inconsistency happened long ago. That timing flexibility is the key idea here, which is why this falls under Rule 806. Other rules address different issues—like how hearsay interacts with other statements, or how a piece of evidence is authenticated or tied to an unavailable declarant—which is why they don’t apply to credibility rehabilitation.