Rule 1004(d) allows admissibility based on not being closely related to a controlling issue. Not closely related to what?

Unlock all questions

This demo includes only 20 questions. Upgrade to access hundreds of questions, flashcards, exam simulations, and disable ads.

Full question bankExam simulationsFlashcards
From $25.99Unlock all

Study for the Midlands Rules Of Evidence Test. Enhance your knowledge with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question comes with explanations. Excel in your exam preparation!

Multiple Choice

Rule 1004(d) allows admissibility based on not being closely related to a controlling issue. Not closely related to what?

Explanation:
The rule is about when a party can admit a copy or substitute for an original without producing the original document. If the matter the original would prove is not closely tied to the controlling issue in the case, then the original isn’t required for admissibility. That means the issue at hand is not central to the main question the court must decide, i.e., it’s not related to the controlling issue, so a duplicate can be admitted. So the phrase “not closely related to the controlling issue” points to an issue that isn’t tied to the case’s main dispute, i.e., an irrelevant issue with respect to the controlling question. The other options don’t fit because the rule only kicks in when the matter isn’t closely related to the controlling issue; a controlling issue would defeat this basis, “a minor issue” isn’t the standard term, and “the entire case” is too broad.

The rule is about when a party can admit a copy or substitute for an original without producing the original document. If the matter the original would prove is not closely tied to the controlling issue in the case, then the original isn’t required for admissibility. That means the issue at hand is not central to the main question the court must decide, i.e., it’s not related to the controlling issue, so a duplicate can be admitted.

So the phrase “not closely related to the controlling issue” points to an issue that isn’t tied to the case’s main dispute, i.e., an irrelevant issue with respect to the controlling question. The other options don’t fit because the rule only kicks in when the matter isn’t closely related to the controlling issue; a controlling issue would defeat this basis, “a minor issue” isn’t the standard term, and “the entire case” is too broad.

More Multiple Choice Questions
Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy