Remainder of or related writings: If a party introduces all or part of a writing, an adverse party may require introduction at the same time of any other part or writing that, in fairness, ought to be considered at the same time.

• A. An adverse party may require introduction of any other part or any other writing at the same time
• B. The remainder may only be introduced later by stipulation
• C. The writing cannot be clarified further
• D. The court must exclude the rest of the writing

Answer: (A)

This question tests the rule about remainder of or related writings: when a party introduces all or part of a writing, the adverse party may require the introduction at the same time of any other part or related writing that, in fairness, ought to be considered together. The idea is to prevent skewing the record by presenting only a fragment and to ensure the full meaning is understood by the trier of fact. So, the adverse party may demand bringing in the rest of that writing or any related writing at the same time to provide proper context. It’s not limited to later stipulations, it doesn’t imply the rest must be excluded, and it isn’t about prohibiting clarification.