Attacking and Supporting the Declarant's Credibility When a hearsay statement has been admitted, the court may admit evidence of the declarant's inconsistent statement or conduct, regardless of when it occurred. Which rule covers this?

• A. Rule 805
• B. Rule 901. (b)(3)
• C. Rule 806
• D. Rule 804. (b)(4)

Answer: (C)

The main idea is that once a hearsay statement has been admitted, the court can attack or bolster the declarant’s credibility using the declarant’s prior inconsistent statements or conduct, and it may consider those things no matter when they occurred. This is governed by Rule 806. The rule allows extrinsic evidence of prior inconsistent statements or conduct to challenge the declarant’s honesty, even if those statements or actions happened in the distant past, because credibility is central to weighing the hearsay itself and any testimony related to it.

For example, if the declarant testifies and there is a prior statement contradicting that testimony, the prior statement may be admitted to show inconsistency. Likewise, conduct suggesting bias or unreliability can be used to undermine credibility, regardless of when it happened.

The other rules referenced address different issues: one covers hearsay within hearsay, another concerns authentication, and another deals with statements against interest when the declarant is unavailable.